Tuesday, 30 October 2012

Indian Media sold to Congress : An Overview


The Congress party essentially owns and controls every single mainstream media house in India, including Hindustan Times, The Times of India, NDTV, CNN-IBN, The Hindu, Tehelka, Outlook, etc, to name a few. Sonia Gandhi need not even give it the most number of ads to exercise editorial control over HT. In fact Congress need not do ANYTHING to exercise editorial control over the entire Indian mainstream media.

Let's start with Hindustan Times (Owned by Birla Group,but Shobana Bhartiya took over. Presently it is working in Collaboration with Times Group.)

1. Shobhna Bhartia, owner and editor-in-chief of Hindustan Times is a Congress MP from Rajya Sabha.

2. Vinod Sharma, HT Political Affairs editor, is essentially a Congress spokesman who can be seen on all TV panel discussions shamelessly supporting congress party, because once his boss' term gets over, he will be looking out for her RS seat next :-)

3. Barkha Dutt and Vir Sanghvi, famous Congress stooges (and intermediaries for UPA allies) who were exposed in the Radiagate scandal showing ugly nexus of Congress-Media-Corporates, and are virtual Congress spokespersons in their capacities as electronic media personalities, are the ones who write opinion and op-ed columns most frequently (once every week) on the editorial pages of HT. In return, Barkha and Sanghvi are rewarded with Padma Shris and other monetary compensation by the Nehru dynasty or Congress party.

4.  Other sister publications of Hindustan Times are Mint (English business daily), Hindustan(Hindi Daily) are no better than their parent publication.

Is NDTV any better?

1. NDTV's  promoters are Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy. Radhika's sister Brinda Karat is a famous CPM leader (well known for anti-Baba Ramdev views) and Brinda's husband Prakash Karat is the CPM Politburo General Secretary (well known for preferring Congress over BJP). And Prannoy Roy's first cousin is the famous far-leftist pro-Maoist-Naxalite pro-Kashmiri-terrorists "intellectual" Arundhati Suzanna Roy.

2. NDTV's Barkha Dutt's reality has already been exposed by me in above section.

3. NDTV's Sonia Singh is the wife of Uttar Pradesh Congress MP, Union minister and ex-princely state ruler, Mr. R. P. N. Singh, who is one of the fastest rising stars in the Congress party. If you remember, Sonia Singh is a very high-profile anchor on NDTV whose pro-Congress anti-BJP bias is legendary.

4. NDTV's Nidhi Razdan (high-profile anchor of Left Right Centre) is the current girlfriend of J&K CM Omar Abdullah (after Omar recently divorced his wife of several years and mother of his two children, Payal). Nidhi Razdan is also famous for her legendary pro-Congress and anti-BJP bias.

Is CNN-IBN any better?

1. Rajdeep Sardesai's wife and co-promoter of CNN-IBN, Sagarika Ghose, who anchors Face the Nation and is famous journalist of CNN-IBN (well, her hubby is the owner-editor-in-chief after all) are famous Congress stooges.

2. Sagarika's father Bhaskar Ghose was a famous sarkari babu and was made the chief of Prasar Bharati (Doordarshan) during Indira and Rajiv regimes. Bhaskar Ghose was well-known for personal loyalty to the Nehru dynasty, and now his daughter is carrying forward the legacy and she and her husband Rajdeep Sardesai are rewarded with their own channel to do Congress propaganda.

3. In fact Sagarika's extended family even consists of her aunts Ruma Pal (former Supreme Court justice and a close friend of the Nehru family) and Arundhati Ghose (former diplomat and Indian ambassador to various countries, predictably, under Congress regimes).

4. Let's now come to another famous CNN-IBN media personality who also writes columns frequently for Hindustan Times -- Karan Thapar. What you may not know is that the Nehru family itself is related, through blood and marriages, to the high-profile Thapar family. India's Army chief during the 1962 debacle against China, Gen. P. N. Thapar, is brother-in-law of Nayantara Sehgal, the daughter of Vijaylakshmi Pandit and niece of Jawaharlal Nehru. Gen. Thapar's son is pro-Congress journalist Karan Thapar. Gen. Thapar's sister is Romila Thapar, a famous "top" typical JNU Nehruvian communist ideologue historian, who gets to write our textbooks and pollute them with pro-Congress Marxist propaganda.

Is The Hindu newspaper any better?

1. N. Ram, owner and editor-in-chief (till February 2012) of The Hindu, was once a vice president of the Students Federation of India. SFI is the students' wing of the CPM.

2. P. Sainath of the The Hindu (acclaimed journalist well known for his, again, unsurprisingly, typical left-wing Nehruvian communism ideology), is the nephew of Congress politician V. Shankar Giri and the grandson of V. V. Giri, ex-President of India and famous Congress politician. Giri was especially known to be one of the first few staunch loyalists of Indira, and whom Indira fielded for President elections against her own party's Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy, and who ultimately became the cause of the first high-profile split in the Indian National Congress into Congress (O) and Congress (I) -- almost all the pre-independence regional stalwarts split away to join Congress (O) or form their own state parties, and the rest including Giri (all the loyalists of the Nehru family staying on with Indira).

Or even what about little known News24 Hindi media channel? Owned by ex-journalist and editor Rajiv Shukla, famous Congress MP in Rajya Sabha, Union minister, industrialist, BCCI vice president and IPL chairman.

Or even what about little known Lokmat (and IBN Lokmat) that is Marathi newspaper (and channel) in Maharashtra? Owner and editors-in-chief are the brothers Vijay Darda (Congress MP) and Rajendra Darda (Congress MLA in Maharashtra, and minister in state govt).

And if u think Times Of India is any better :

1. Times Of India, Mid-Day, Nav-Bharth Times, Stardust, Femina, Vijay Times, Vijaya Karnataka, Times now (24- hour news channel) and many more are owned by Bennet & Coleman. 'World Christian Councilข does 80 percent of the Funding, and an Englishman and an Italian equally share balance 20 percent. The Italian Robertio Mindo is a close relative of Sonia Gandhi.

2.The SIT appointed by SC indicated that Manoj Mitta,a Times of India journalist was hand in gloves with the Anti-Modi cottage Industry to malign Modi's image and was also helping Sanjiv Bhatt (Yes same IPS who was shemelessly asking for BlackBerry from Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil ) in falsifying affidavits against Modi.

3. And just recently their sleuth-journos were in the forefront to "expose" BJP president Nitin Gadkari that they went to each nooks and crannies to find companies listed on his company's website.I am not supporting Gadkari but it sure rings bells that why would Times of India never sent its journos to find similar shady deals of Robert Vadra or Salman Khurshid or even to research how Sonia Gandhi became 4th richest politician of the world ?

Even bigger and smaller media houses, such as The Times of India and Indian Express, are where the Nehru dynasty has managed to infiltrate its loyalists such as Dileep Padgaonkar and Shekhar Gupta, who are essentially paid stooges of the Congress party.


The Congress (in fact just the one single family -- the Nehru dynasty) has been in power for 56 of the last 65 years of independence. This matters a LOT. Personal relationships have been built, blackmail-worthy secrets have been spied, monumental wealth has been accumulated ... all by the one single Nehru dynasty (and its family-business-cum-political-party aka Congress) that helps it maintain its tight irongrip over not just the entire Indian mainstream media, but also deep into our bureaucracy, our governmental institutions, and even our journalism and mass media colleges and grad schools.

We have probably not even scratched the surface of the network of family and personal relationships through which the Nehru dynasty has completely dominated and controlled the entire intellectual, historian and journalist landscape of India. And we haven't even talked about the monumental wealth or the blackmailing secrets. All because the one single dynasty got to rule over India for 60 years uninterrupted. As I said, it matters a LOT.

The typical JNU Nehruvian communist left-libbers ideologues have really perpetrated some kind of stranglehold on India's journalism, media and intellectual space. Almost all pro-BJP (or even centre-right ideologues) journalists have been slowly thrown out of their jobs due to pressure from the Congress and the Nehru family. Even the great venerable Ramnath Goenka, frustrated and broken by repeated I-T raids and ED investigations ultimately had to fire Arun Shourie twice from the Indian Express, which was once the best Indian newspaper in the 1970s and 80s. That was the team -- Goenka the owner, Shourie the editor, and S. Gurumurthy the fearless journalist, that brought political heavyweights like Indira Gandhi down on her knees and even took on corporate honchos like Dhirubhai Ambani. (Ramnath Goenka inspired the Mithun Chakraborty character and S. Gurumurthy inspired the R. Madhavan character in the Ambani biopic "Guru".) But very few centre-right ideologues are left in India's media space today, that too in minor publications like The Pioneer. Almost all the mainstream media houses have been thoroughly infiltrated and coerced into towing the Congress' line, sometimes just through ideology and relationships, and not even money power.


Thursday, 25 October 2012

Modi emerging as popular leader among Muslims in Gujarat - Pakistani Press


Just a couple of weeks back I stumbled upon an article in a Pakistani Newspaper publishing an article about growing popularity of Modi among muslims in Gujarat.

Although the aricle brings myriad of surprise by a simple fact that it is a Pro-Modi article in a Pakistani News Paper.But being a Pakistani NP they have still added some "flavour" so that they are not banned or worse attacked for publishing such article.

So here is the article and also I have added my comments in brackets to let you know what "flavours" I am talking about.


"Of all the politicians, Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi is emerging as the popular leader of Muslims in Gujarat"





Modi has grown apologetic (1st flavour,we know Modi never apologised citing the reason that its a crime which deserve no apology) and is trying to woo the minorities after the 2002 programme. His efforts are bearing fruit and the ground situation bares the fact he would return to power with comfortable majority in the 2012 Legislative Assembly elections.

First Muslim support was seen in Gujarat in 2010 during civic polls in which the BJP swept all the six municipal corporations on account of 30 per cent Muslims voted for it.

The party gained two-third majority in the municipal corporations of Ahmedabad, Vadodara, Surat, Rajkot and Bhavnagar. This huge political change came about after eight years of the Gujarat massacre. It would have seemed a little funny some years ago if someone had predicted that Muslims would give a massive vote for the BJP.

The situation is tilting in Modi’s favour, partly due to his development programmes and 4000 days of good governance, and partly due to panic in the Congress party.(Very Honest..!!)

In fact, the Congress has no leader in Gujarat of Modi’s stature. The Congress is relying only Shanker Sinh Waghela who ironically joined Congress after being expelled from the BJP. People have seen Waghela’s eight months corrupt and dishonest tenure as the CM of Gujarat. Waghela’s palatial house on Gandhinagar-Mansa Highway is an ordinary reflection of his misrule.

Another Congressman Himmat Sinh Patel had also left the Muslims in a lurch when riots had broken out in the State. When the rioters vandalized the shrine of Wali Gujarati, Patel was the Mayor of Ahmedabad. He overnight constructed a road across the shrine, demolishing it completely.(Indian MSM will never tell you about this fact nor will any anti-Modi cottage industry headed by Teesta)

Gujarati Muslims do not have sympathy for the Congress for other reasons also. Sonia Gandhi’s political advisor Ahmed Patel belongs to a Muslim dominated district Bharuch of Gujarat that happens to be his stronghold. Till date, he did not utter a word against Narendra Modi. The overwhelming welcome received by Modi in Bharuch extended by Muslim women during his yatra must be a warning to Ahmed Patel.

Secondly, the Central government of the UPA is also responsible for this erosion. Recently, a Muslim welfare organization, the Gujarat Sarvajanik Welfare Trust applied to the Central Home Ministry to get it registered under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Rules, 2011 to get foreign donations. The Home Ministry rejected the application saying ‘it is against the public interest’.

Moreover, the image-building task has been entrusted to two key figures of the Muslim community. One is Gujarat Haj Committee Chairperson Sufi Sayyad Mehboob Ali and other is retired Indian Administrative Service officer and Gujarat Waqf Board Chairman Ali Sayid. The BJP Minority Cell and Modi’s key strategists are monitoring the task and minority welfare programmes.

The State government data and Sachchar Committee Report on Minorities reveal that Muslims are well off in Gujarat in comparison to other parts of India. They have developed more even after the genocide. Modi supporters attribute this to his various minority welfare schemes. In Gujarat there are 89 per cent Hindus, 9.1 per cent Muslims, 1.0 percent Jains and 0.1 per cent Sikhs. Two districts Bharuch and Kutch have maximum population of Muslims. Each has 21 percent. Next comes Jamnagar where Muslims are 14 percent. It is noteworthy, according to the State government data, 40 percent businessmen are Muslims whereas in Kutch 47 percent Muslims are involved in the ship building yard business.

In 2006, Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh appointed a high powered committee headed by Justice Rajinder Sachchar (former PM IK Gujral’s brother-in-law and former Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court.) to make detailed study of the economic, social and educational condition of the Muslims of the country.

The Sachchar Committee after completing the task submitted its report of over 400 pages. The report reveals that Muslims of Gujarat are well-off than the Muslims of other parts of India.

In terms of literacy level, Muslims in Gujarat stand at 73.5 percent as compared to the national average of 59.1 percent. The figure of the urban males is 76; it was 81 for those living in rural areas as compared to the national average of 70 and 67 respectively. (The Sachchar Committee report: Appendix table 4.1, Page No. 287)


Even Muslim women in urban areas of Gujarat have average literacy rate 05 point higher than the national average whereas women of rural Gujarat fare even better with a literacy rate of 57 percent as compared to the national average of 43 percent. (The Sachchar Committee report: Appendix table 4.1 b, Page No. 289)

In Gujarat, a greater percentage of Muslims have attained primary, secondary and higher secondary level education compared to national average and compared to other States. Against the national average of 60.9 percent, Gujarat has 74.9 percent Muslims at the primary level while the percentage is 45.3 at the secondary level as compared to the national average of 40.5 percent. (The Sachchar Committee report: Appendix table 4.6 and 4.7, Page Nos. 295,296,297,298)

Most importantly, in terms of per month per capita income, Muslims in the urban areas of Gujarat earn an average 875 rupees that is higher than the national average of 804 rupees. In contrast, it is 662 rupees in Uttar Pradesh, 748 rupees in West Bengal, 811 rupees in Punjab, 803 rupees in Andhra Pradesh and 837 rupees in Karnataka. (The Sachchar Committee report: Appendix table 8.2, Page No. 364)

In rural Gujarat, the per capita income, per month of Muslims is 668 rupees as compared to the national average of 553 rupees. (The Sachchar Committee report: Appendix table 8.5, Page No. 370)

Even in terms of share of Muslims in government job, it is 5.9 percent in Gujarat while it is 2.1 percent in West Bengal, 3.2 percent in Delhi and 4.4 percent in Maharashtra. (The Sachchar Committee report: Appendix table 9.4, Page No. 370)

This shows that despite all odds, Muslims have begun responding to Modi’s efforts. He is successfully distancing himself from the culprits of anti-Muslim riots, and this would pay him in the election.

Also watch the following video of Muslims telling why they trust Modi : (Courtesy Youtube)